Most countries and especially those in Latin America begin their social responsibility actions in the 19th century on the initiative of the private sector, many of them based on charitable work and through private donations and requirements of a fundamentally ethical or family nature, of absolutely individual and philanthropic cut.

It is not until a century later that issues such as human rights, the environment, labor practices, consumer protection, and fair operating practices arise.

The term social responsibility as such begins to be used in the 1970s, however, there is evidence that very early in history that there was already talk of responsibility with society linked this issue to the entrepreneur and not to the company.

However, the issue of philanthropy today and as a result of poverty rates and the widening gap between rich and poor has once again become a point of discussion when discussing the issue of social responsibility.

The recently approved ISO 26000 Standard mentions philanthropy in several of its elements, however, it emphasizes that philanthropy should not be confused with social responsibility because philanthropic activities themselves do not achieve the objective of integrating social responsibility into the organization.

Because of the boom that philanthropy has taken again and in order to exchange views on this exciting topic, obtaining interesting conclusions oriented to whether philanthropy is part or not of Social Responsibility. If you want to read daily publication of opinion, different ideas, and different news from the realm of philanthropy then Scott Copper Miami is the best option for you

The different topics are indicated below:

Social responsibility is linked to the strategy of the organization, philanthropy is a starting point of social responsibility in companies, however the latter is much more and philanthropy should only stay at the beginning and not become makeup; However, for some companies this is not the case, they start with philanthropy and remain the same.

•    Philanthropy should be a start of the community's commitment to social responsibility while responsibility allows for closer ties with stakeholders.

•    Philanthropy is part of social investment but not limiting. (For example, subsidies, volunteering, and donations).

•    More information is required to move from philanthropy to social responsibility, the latter see it as expenses while philanthropy seems easier to them.

•    We must avoid the actions that perpetuate the dependence of the community with the organizations (As the old saying goes, we must teach to fish).

•    The CSR should be assumed as a management system, a way of understanding the company regarding the environment and its influence is the creation of common value, inclusive business, and goes beyond philanthropy.

•    Philanthropy creates dependency while CSR creates commitment.

•    The corporate social responsibility is to be and not seem to be: it is an investment in integral development, planning, projects for / with stakeholders - synergies -, active social role, service, commitment, sincere dialogue, coherence and articulation internally and externally with the new values -example: work-family reconciliation- forming a learning process to go professionalizing and directing the action, actions are planned that look for impact - transformative actions-, is to think about sustainable development, generating value, it is a search for renewal cultural.

•    Articulation of a business model as an integral part of a business strategy. Interest in the evaluation of results. Mutual benefit - is to go beyond the interest of shareholders, considering the creation of value for other actors with which the company relates, and for society in general.

•    Philanthropy –love for man-: simple donation, or isolated actions of beneficence, paternalism, informal generosity (that is, without structure or management orientation, goals are not identified). Donations may be made without considering the integration of the CSR concept as corporate value, or internal regulations or regulations that ensure the coherence of the company's members' performance with the new values, short term vision, are not established. It does not necessarily affect the scope of influence of the company. Marketing can also be considered for purely superficial cause. Larger impact on unsecured social environment may also be anonymous